<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Austin Real Estate Daily - Forum: Announcements &#38; News </title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Austin Real Estate Daily is an online resource dedicated to giving the real estate industry a spot to find inspiration, compare investment strategies and stay updated with the community. Search the Austin MLS, get free market statistics, ask the experts in our forum and the truth about central Texas real estate without all the doom and gloom.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Forum Version 3.1.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum?announcements-news&#038;xfeed=forum" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title> on Austin ranked 9th best in the US with less than a 1% risk of a price decline</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/austin-ranked-9th-best-in-the-us-with-less-than-a-1-risk-of-a-price-decline/page-1/post-56/#p56</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/austin-ranked-9th-best-in-the-us-with-less-than-a-1-risk-of-a-price-decline/page-1/post-56/#p56</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignleft alignnone" style="float: left; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/pknowlen/pmi_house.jpg" alt="PMI House Illustration" /><span><strong><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold;"></span></span></strong></span>

<span><strong><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold;">PMI </span></span></strong></span><span><strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold;">Fall</span></span></strong></span><span><strong><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-weight: bold;"> 2008 Risk Index Indicates Rising Foreclosures and Unemployment Intensifying Risk of Future Home Price Declines</span></span></strong></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Housing Affordability Continues to Improve</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">WALNUT CREEK, Calif., Oct. 1 /PRNewswire/ -- PMI Mortgage Insurance Co., the primary U.S. subsidiary of The PMI Group, Inc. (NYSE: PMI), today released its Fall 2008 U.S. Market Risk Index(SM), which shows increases in foreclosures and unemployment have significantly heightened the risk of future home price declines. <span>PMI's</span> U.S. Market Risk Index(SM) ranks the nation's 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas (<span>MSAs</span>) according to the likelihood that home prices will be lower in two years.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Risk scores translate directly into an estimated percentage risk that home prices will be lower in two years. The <span>Fall</span> 2008 Risk Index is based on second-quarter Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) data. A complete copy of the <span>Fall</span> 2008 PMI Economic and Real Estate <span>TrendsSM</span> (ERET) report and an appendix that provides data for all 381 U.S. <span>MSAs</span> is available at: <a href="http://www.pmi-us.com/eret" target="_blank">http://www.pmi-us.com/eret</a>.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The risk of future price declines rose by more than 10 percent in 16 of the nation's top 50 <span>MSAs</span>, primarily in areas of the country that experienced major increases in house prices during the housing boom. Only two <span>MSAs</span> -- Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA and Boston-Quincy,  MA -- saw their risk decrease by more than one percent. Among the top 50 <span>MSAs</span>, 17 ranked in the highest risk category and 16 of those were in California, Florida, Nevada, and Arizona.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"The risk of future home price declines increased in 94 percent of all 381 <span>MSAs</span> in the country this quarter," said David <span>Berson</span>, <span>PMI's</span> Chief Economist and Strategist. "The majority of these increases aren't statistically significant, in many cases risk increased by less than ten percent, but risk did increase by a significant amount -- as much as 30 percent or more -- in some states and <span>MSAs</span> where foreclosures and unemployment increased significantly."</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The highest risk of future price declines remains in Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL (99.5 percent), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (99.5 percent), Orlando-Kissimmee, FL (99.4 percent), Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL (99.3 percent), Tampa-St. <span>Petersberg</span>-Clearwater, FL (99 percent). The areas with the lowest risk of price declines -- less than one percent -- are in Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX, Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX and Pittsburgh, PA.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Housing affordability also failed to improve this quarter, according to <span>PMI's</span> proprietary Affordability Index(SM), which measures how affordable homes are today in a given MSA relative to a baseline of 1995. An Affordability Index score exceeding 100 indicates that homes have become more affordable while a score below 100 means they are less affordable.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Across the nation, 40 percent of the nation's 381 <span>MSAs</span> showed increased affordability; while 60 percent of all <span>MSAs</span> experienced declines in affordability. Affordability remains challenged in 14 of the 17 <span>MSAs</span> with risk scores in the highest risk ranks. Home prices in these areas will need to fall further in order to move back in line with incomes before there will be meaningful reductions in risk scores.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In addition to the PMI U.S. Market Risk Index showing the risk of price declines, <span>PMI's</span> <span>Fall</span> 2008 ERET examines major changes in the mortgage origination trends as well as the impact foreclosures and unemployment are having on home prices in the second quarter of 2008.</span></span>
<pre><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial;"> </span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial;"> </span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial;">PMI Fall 2008 PMI U.S. Market Risk Index</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;"> </span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial;">    Rank   MSA                                                                         Score</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach; FL A          99.5</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario; CA                         99.5</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Orlando-Kissimmee; FL                                        99.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall; FL                                99.3</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater; FL                          99.0</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Las Vegas-Paradise; NV                                       98.5</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale; CA                          98.5</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine; CA                                 97.7</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Jacksonville; FL                                             97.5</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale; AZ                                  96.3</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville; CA                        96.3</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos; CA                            95.9</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Oakland-Fremont-Hayward; CA                                  94.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara; CA                           87.1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      Providence-New Bedford-Fall River; RI-MA                     72.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    1      San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City; CA                     71.6</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    3      Edison-New Brunswick; NJ                                     35.1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    3      Nassau-Suffolk; NY                                           29.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    3      Washington-Arlington-Alexandria; DC-VA-MD-WV                 26.0</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    3      Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News; VA-NC                   25.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    4      Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn; MI                                 17.8</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    4      Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington; MN-WI                      14.8</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    4      Newark-Union; NJ-PA                                          14.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    4      Baltimore-Towson; MD                                         10.1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      New York-White Plains-Wayne; NY-NJ                            9.8</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Boston-Quincy; MA                                             7.7</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills; MI                              7.3</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton; OR-WA                           6.4</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Chicago-Naperville-Joliet; IL                                 6.3</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta; GA                            3.5</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Seattle-Bellevue-Everett; WA                                  2.3</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Philadelphia; PA                                              2.1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Cambridge-Newton-Framingham; MA                               1.6</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin; TN                  1.6</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor; OH                                   1.1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      St. Louis, MO-IL                                               &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis; WI                              &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord; NC-SC                              &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Cincinnati-Middletown; OH-KY-IN                                &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Denver-Aurora; CO                                              &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Columbus; OH                                                   &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">      <span style="background: yellow none repeat scroll 0% 50%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">5          Austin-Round Rock; TX                                                             &#60;1</span></span></span></strong></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Kansas City; MO-KS                                             &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Indianapolis-Carmel; IN                                        &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Memphis, TN-MS-AR                                              &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      San Antonio; TX                                                &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">           Pittsburgh; PA                                                 &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown; TX                                 &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Dallas-Plano-Irving; TX                                        &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">    5      Fort Worth-Arlington; TX                                       &#60;1</span></span></pre>
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">About <span>PMI's</span> Economic &#38; Real Estate Trends(SM) (ERET) and U.S. Market Risk Index(SM)</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The PMI Economic and Real Estate Trends (ERET) containing the U.S. Market Risk Index is published quarterly by PMI Mortgage Insurance Co., a subsidiary of The PMI Group, Inc. (NYSE: PMI). The Risk Index is a proprietary statistical model that measures geographic house price risk by predicting the probability that home prices in the nation's 381 largest metropolitan statistical areas (<span>MSAs</span>) and metropolitan statistical area divisions (<span>MSADs</span>) (as measured by the House Price Index from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)) will be lower in two years. The PMI U.S. Market Risk Index is based on data including the OFHEO House Price Index, labor market statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the PMI Affordability Index, which uses local per capita household income, home price appreciation, and a blended mortgage rate to calculate the local share of mortgage payment to income relative to its baseline year of 1995. The PMI U.S. Market Risk Index scale ranges from one to 100 and translates to a percentage. For example, a score of 50 indicates a 50 percent chance that home prices will be lower in two years.</span></span>

<span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">About PMI Mortgage Insurance Co.</span></span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. (PMI US), a subsidiary of The PMI Group, Inc. (NYSE: PMI), provides residential mortgage insurance to mortgage lenders, capital market participants, and investors throughout the United States. PMI US is incorporated in Arizona, headquartered in Walnut  Creek, CA, and licensed in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. By mitigating default risk, residential mortgage insurance expands home ownership opportunities and assists financial institutions in reducing the capital they are required to hold against low down payment mortgages. PMI US is rated A+ by Standard and Poor's, Aa2 by Moody's, and A+ by Fitch. For more information: <a href="http://www.pmi-us.com/" target="_blank">http://www.pmi-us.com</a>.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Cautionary Statement: Statements in this press release that are not historical facts or that relate to future plans, events or performance are 'forward-looking' statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, <span>PMI's</span> U.S. Market Risk Index, Affordability Index, and any related discussion, and statements relating to future economic and housing market conditions. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following factors: changes in economic conditions, economic recession or slowdowns, adverse changes in consumer confidence, declining housing values, higher unemployment, deteriorating borrower credit, changes in interest rates, or a combination of these factors. Readers are cautioned that any statements with respect to future economic and housing market conditions are based upon current economic conditions and, therefore, are inherently uncertain and highly subject to the changes in the factors enumerated above. Other risk and uncertainties are discussed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and Form 10-Q's for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">SOURCE PMI Mortgage Insurance Co.</span></span>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title> on House votes down massive bailout measure</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/house-votes-down-massive-bailout-measure/page-1/post-48/#p48</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/house-votes-down-massive-bailout-measure/page-1/post-48/#p48</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">BREAKING NEWS</span></strong>

<strong></strong> <span style="color: #c0c0c0;"><span id="udtD">updated <span class="time">1:33 p.m. CT,</span> <span class="date">Mon., Sept. 29, 2008</span></span></span><script type="text/javascript"><!--
		function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) {
			var n = document.getElementById("udtD");
			if(pdt != '' &#038;&#038; n &#038;&#038; window.DateTime) {
				var dt = new DateTime();
				pdt = dt.T2D(pdt);
				if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,((''.toLowerCase()=='false')?false:true));}
			}
		}
		UpdateTimeStamp('633583100128230000');
// --></script>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><a href="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/breaking-news2.gif"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-667" style="float: left; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="breaking-news2" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/breaking-news2.gif" alt="" /></a><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>WASHINGTON</strong></span> - The House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue package, ignoring urgent pleas from President Bush and bipartisan congressional leaders to quickly bail out the staggering financial industry.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Stocks plummeted on Wall Street even before the 228-205 vote to reject the bill was announced on the House floor. When the critical vote was tallied, too few members of the House were willing to support the unpopular measure with elections just five weeks away. Ample no votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Bush and a host of leading congressional figures had implored the lawmakers to pass the legislation despite howls of protest from their constituents back home.<!--more--></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><a title="Melissa Francis reports on the financial markets" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26945028#26945028" target="_blank"><img class="alignright alignnone size-medium wp-image-668" style="float: right; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="vid" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/vid.gif" alt="" /></a>The vote had been preceded by unusually aggressive White House lobbying, and spokesman Tony Fratto said that Bush had used a "call list" of people he wanted to persuade to vote yes as late as just a short time before the vote.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Lawmakers shouted news of the plummeting Dow Jones average as lawmakers crowded on the House floor during the drawn-out and tense call of the roll, which dragged on for roughly 40 minutes as leaders on both sides scrambled to corral enough of their rank-and-file members to support the deeply unpopular measure.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">They found only two.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Bush and his economic advisers, as well as congressional leaders in both parties had argued the plan was vital to insulating ordinary Americans from the effects of Wall Street's bad bets. The version that was up for vote Monday was the product of marathon closed-door negotiations on Capitol Hill over the weekend.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">"We're all worried about losing our jobs," Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declared in an impassioned speech in support of the bill before the vote. "Most of us say, 'I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it — not me.' "</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">With their dire warnings of impending economic doom and their sweeping request for unprecedented sums of money and authority to bail out cash-starved financial firms, Bush and his economic chiefs have focused the attention of world markets on Congress, Ryan added.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><a title="Pelosi: " href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26945028#26944027" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-669" style="float: left; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="palosi" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/palosi.gif" alt="" /></a>"We're in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us," he said.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Even as the electronic roll call began, Democratic and Republican leaders were uncertain about having enough votes to pass the politically unpopular plan. It's the most sweeping government intervention in markets since the Great Depression.</p>
The bailout would have put in place an unprecedented federal program to buy up rotten assets from cash-starved firms. The goal is to free up choked credit that was threatening to cause broader market turmoil.
<p class="textBodyBlack">"Many of us feel that the national interest requires us to do something which is, in many ways, unpopular," said Rep. Barney Frank, the Financial Services Committee chairman, before the vote. "It is hard to get political credit for avoiding something that has not yet happened."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The bill was the product of marathon bargaining over the weekend among various House and Senate representatives.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">President Bush urged the bill's passage, saying in a White House appearance Monday morning that "every member of Congress and every American should keep in mind that a vote for this bill is a vote to prevent economic damage to you and your community."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">"With this strong and decisive legislation," he said, "we will help restart the flow of credit so American families can meet their daily needs and American businesses can make purchases, ship goods and meet their payrolls."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">As debate opened, Frank, D-Mass., called the measure "a tough vote," but a necessary one to stave off a financial meltdown. It lets the government buy sour assets — mostly mortgage-backed securities — from struggling financial institutions in a bid to clear out clogged avenues of credit for businesses and individuals alike.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">At the White House, spokesman Tony Fratto confirmed vigorous efforts to get the bill through.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">"We're going to keep working with them right up until the vote," he said.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Fratto also said that Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Treasury Secretary Paulson, White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and other top officials were contacting House members in an effort to rally support, and that the president himself had call list of "a couple dozen members."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Fratto said Bush was telling aides some of those he'd talked to were committed to voting for the bill while "others remained skeptical."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">With their dire warnings of impending economic doom and their sweeping request for unprecedented sums of money and authority to bail out cash-starved financial firms, Bush and his economic chiefs have focused the attention of the world and the markets on Congress, said Ryan. Without the bill, Ryan added, "the worst is yet to come."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Two leading players also spoke early Monday, lobbying on morning television news shows for approval of a package deeply unpopular with a public angry that taxpayer money will save Wall Street firms from heavy risk-taking. Thousands of angry phone calls, e-mails and letters have poured into Capitol Hill from constituents. Supporters essentially acknowledged that it was a hold-your-nose-and-vote matter.</p>

<p class="textBodyBlack">
<table style="padding: 5px 0pt 0pt 15px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span><script type="text/javascript"><!--
getCSS("3053751")
// --></script>
<div class="box_3053751 cbx cbx-auto" style="width: 300px;"><script type="text/javascript"></script>
<table class="boxH_3053751" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="300">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="boxHI_3053751" width="1%"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26843303/"><img src="http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/ArtAndPhoto-Fronts/BUSINESS/Projects/Economy%20turmoil/TZ_298_Economy_Turmoil.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="298" height="56" /></a></td>
<td class="boxHC_3053751" width="*"></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table class="boxB_3053751" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="300">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td class="boxBI_3053751">
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a class="icoUpd" title="Updated" name="icon_U" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26884523"> </a> <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26884523/">House votes down massive bailout measure</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a class="icoUpd" title="Updated" name="icon_U" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3683270"> </a> <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3683270/">Dow tumbles as bailout vote fails</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a class="icoNew" title="Updated 18 minutes ago" name="icon_U" href="javascript:vPlayer('26945010','bcccee93-2620-4a6e-82c0-205c9b0744db')"> </a> <a class="icoVid" title="Click to view video: " href="javascript:vPlayer('26945010','bcccee93-2620-4a6e-82c0-205c9b0744db')"> </a> <a href="javascript:vPlayer('26945010','bcccee93-2620-4a6e-82c0-205c9b0744db')">Video: Wall St. bailout plan fails</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26907361/">Financial crisis: What you should know</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26890600/">Answer Desk: What's your take on bailout?</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26931454/">Foreclosures are key element missing in plan</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26907205/">Interactive: Winners and losers</a></span></div>
<div class="textHang" style="padding-bottom: 3px;"><span class="headlineList2"><a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/PDFs/ayo08c04_xml.pdf">Full text of the Wall Street rescue plan</a></span></div></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</p><p class="textBodyBlack">Critics on the left and right said Congress was being stampeded into hasty action on a plan that wouldn't make a dent in the nation's economic woes, which have at their root a subprime mortgage meltdown and the bursting of the housing bubble, followed by a wave of foreclosures.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The legislation does not require any federal action to prevent foreclosures, although it mandates that the government try renegotiating the bad mortgages it acquires with the aim of lowering borrowers' monthly payments so they can keep their homes.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">"Like the Iraq war and the Patriot Act, this bill is fueled on fear and hinges on haste," said Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, R-Texas.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title> on Plan to avert market depression in works</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/plan-to-avert-market-depression-in-works/page-1/post-45/#p45</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/plan-to-avert-market-depression-in-works/page-1/post-45/#p45</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/97645.gif"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-658" style="float: left; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="97645" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/97645.gif" alt="" width="422" height="306" /></a>AUSTIN, Texas (NBC) -- In another dramatic development from Wall Street, two finance giants are trying to save themselves.

It comes as lawmakers this week debate a plan Bush administration officials said will avert a depression.

With the fed's approval Sunday night, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley will become more like traditional banks, taking deposits, reshuffling assets and accepting more regulation, a reshaping of an industry poised to get bailed out.

"This'll be far less costly to the American taxpayer than the alternative, and that's why I'm confident that Congress is going to move and move quickly," said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.<!--more-->

The plan would have the government buy up $700 billion in bad debt. The money could be recouped when assets are sold later, but that's not certain.

"To put the taxpayers' funds at risk is a serious question, and this is a very serious money," said Rep. John Boehner of Ohio.

Democrats want help for homeowners, not just banks.

"I don't want the federal taxpayer to be at risk for their bad debt, and then the guy who incurred the debt gets tens of millions of dollars on the way out the door," said Barney Frank, with the House committee on financial services.

Both White House hopefuls back strict oversight of the bailout but sound different on new rules for Wall Street.

"What we don't want is a situation where they are able to say, 'Heads, I win; Tails, the taxpayer loses,'" said Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. "And you know, this whole process of deregulation is one that I think could have been thought through. Still a deregulator?"

"Of course, I don't," said Republican presidential candidate John McCain. "Americans don't want increased regulations on their lives."

Both also want pay limits for CEOs of firms that get bailout help.

Expect the candidates to talk more about the bailout in their first debate Friday night in Mississippi. Congress is expected to approve some form of the rescue package by then.
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title> on Austin Ranked 4th Best Performing City</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/austin-ranked-4th-best-performing-city/page-1/post-42/#p42</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/austin-ranked-4th-best-performing-city/page-1/post-42/#p42</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/austin4.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-652" style="float: left; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="austin4" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/austin4.jpg" alt="" /></a>The Milken Institute/Greenstreet Real Estate Partners Best Performing Cities Index ranks U.S. metropolitan areas by how well they are creating and sustaining jobs and economic growth.  The components include job, wage and salary and technology growth.

The Best Performing Cities ranking depicts those U.S. metropolitan areas that are recording the top economic performance.

The full report can be downloaded <a href="http://www.milkeninstitute.org/publications/publications.taf?function=detail&#38;ID=38801171&#38;cat=resrep"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">here</span></a>.

<!--more-->
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/space.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-633 aligncenter" title="space" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/space.gif" alt="" width="283" height="38" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bestcities.milkeninstitute.org/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-653 aligncenter" title="stats" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/stats.gif" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Kevin Bown on Government takes control of  Fannie, Freddie</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/government-takes-control-of-fannie-freddie/page-1/post-30/#p30</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/government-takes-control-of-fannie-freddie/page-1/post-30/#p30</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>To what degree can the Feds influence underwriting guidelines at Fannie and Freddie? Will we see them make adjustments to their loan underwriting guidelines, now that the Feds/We own Fannie/Freddie?</p>
<br />
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>John McClellan on Government takes control of  Fannie, Freddie</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/government-takes-control-of-fannie-freddie/page-1/post-29/#p29</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/government-takes-control-of-fannie-freddie/page-1/post-29/#p29</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &#34;Calibri&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;; mso-fareast-font-family: &#39;Times New Roman&#39;; mso-bidi-font-family: &#39;Times New Roman&#39;; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">&#160;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="color: #1f497d;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">In better news&#8230;.since the FHFA has taken over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the perception of risk for MBSs has been reduced and the spread between them and Bonds has dramatically shrank overnight causing our rates to decline&#8230;how long it will last and what changes the FHFA will implement on the underwriting side is yet to be determined.</span></span></span></p>
<br />
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title> on Government takes control of  Fannie, Freddie</title>
	<link>http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/government-takes-control-of-fannie-freddie/page-1/post-27/#p27</link>
	<category>Announcements &#38; News </category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinrealestatedaily.com/forum/announcements-news/government-takes-control-of-fannie-freddie/page-1/post-27/#p27</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Move is intended to prevent major financial turmoil</strong></h2>
<h3><span style="color: #ff0000;">BREAKING NEWS </span>MSNBC News Services</h3>
<div class="textMedBlack">

<a href="javascript:vPlayer('26591266','8c3d50ce-7c61-4a34-afcf-42cd63a3c26d')" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-601" style="margin: 3px 8px; float: left;" title="gov" src="http://austinrealestatedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/gov.gif" alt="" /></a>

</div>
<div class="textTimestamp"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
		function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) {
			var n = document.getElementById("udtD");
			if(pdt != '' &#038;&#038; n &#038;&#038; window.DateTime) {
				var dt = new DateTime();
				pdt = dt.T2D(pdt);
				if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,((''.toLowerCase()=='false')?false:true));}
			}
		}
		UpdateTimeStamp('633563987426970000');
// --></script></div>
<p class="textBodyBlack">WASHINGTON - The U.S. government announced on Sunday that it was taking control of troubled mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, effectively wiping out shareholders' interest in the publicly traded companies.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The regulator of the two companies, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) will manage the two companies on a temporary basis.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The takeover is the second rescue bid engineered by the U.S. Treasury Department in little more than six weeks. It came as confidence in the firms' ability to keep operating amid a deepening housing crisis continued to erode.Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director James Lockhart, regulator for the so-called GSEs or government-sponsored enterprises, called a Sunday-morning news conference to spell out the latest rescue effort. <!--more--></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Officials said the executives of both institutions had been replaced. Herb Allison, a former vice chairman of Merryl Lynch, was selected to head Fannie Mae, and David Moffett, a former vice chairman of US Bancorp, was picked to head Freddie Mac.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Paulson said the actions were being taken because "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are so large and so interwoven in our financial system that a failure of either of them would cause great turmoil in our financial markets here at home and around the globe."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">"A failure would affect the ability of Americans to get home loans, auto loans and other consumer credit and business finance," Paulson said.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Both companies were placed into a government conservatorship that will be run by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the new agency created by Congress this summer to regulate Fannie and Freddie.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The Federal Reserve and other federal Banking regulators said in a joint statement Sunday that "a limited number of smaller institutions" have significant holdings of common or preferred stock shares in Fannie and Freddie, and that regulators were "prepared to work with these institutions to develop capital-restoration plans."</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The two companies had nearly $36 billion in preferred shares outstanding as of June 30, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The announcement followed an intense round of meetings on Friday and Saturday with directors and top leaders of the GSEs, who are expected to be dismissed after having come under stiff criticism for their high pay and management shortcomings.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">The two mortgage companies are a vital cog in the United States housing industry because they own or guarantee almost half the nation's $12 trillion in outstanding home mortgage debt. The housing sector would have difficulty recovering from its deepest slump since the Great Depression unless Fannie or Freddie are stabilized and able to continue their role in buying mortgage loans and packaging them into securities sold around the world.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><em>This breaking news story will be updated.</em></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>